From @moritz

<not_gerd> r​: multi sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here'; }; foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤»

Works without the "multi"​:

<moritz> r​: sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here' }; foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤not here␤»

From @masak

<doy> r​: our $thing = False; proto foo {*}; multi foo { temp $thing =
True }; sub bar { die "???" if $thing }; foo; bar;
<p6eval> rakudo 930369​: OUTPUT«??? [...]
<doy> r​: our $thing = False; sub foo { temp $thing = True }; sub bar {
die "???" if $thing }; foo; bar;
<p6eval> rakudo 930369​: ( no output )
<doy> seems like temp doesn't work properly in multisubs?
* masak submits rakudobug

From @masak

<jnthn> masak​: the "temp" issue is a well known one of LEAVE/multi
interaction, which is already filed.

@masak - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @jnthn

On Thu Jun 07 13​:52​:49 2012, moritz wrote​:

<not_gerd> r​: multi sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here'; };
foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤»

Works without the "multi"​:

<moritz> r​: sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here' }; foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤not here␤»

Fixed after the recent multi-dispatch changes​:

multi sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here'; }; foo;
here
not here

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Sat Mar 16 10​:02​:08 2013, jnthn@​jnthn.net wrote​:

On Thu Jun 07 13​:52​:49 2012, moritz wrote​:

<not_gerd> r​: multi sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here'; };
foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤»

Works without the "multi"​:

<moritz> r​: sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here' }; foo;
<p6eval> rakudo 332540​: OUTPUT«here␤not here␤»

Fixed after the recent multi-dispatch changes​:

multi sub foo() { say 'here'; LEAVE say 'not here'; }; foo;
here
not here

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

Test added in S04-phasers/enter-leave.t

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

@coke - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'