From @masak

<doy> r​: role Foo { method bar { "ROLE​:" ~ (self.defined ?? "D" !!
"U") } }; class Bar does Foo { method bar { "CLASS​:" ~ (self.defined
?? "D" !! "U") ~ "-" ~ self.Foo​::bar } }; say Bar.new.bar
<p6eval> rakudo c8de2e​: OUTPUT«CLASS​:D-ROLE​:U␤»
<doy> ^^ bug?
<doy> or is there another way i'm supposed to be doing that call
<masak> doy​: in-ter-es-ting.
<masak> doy++
* masak submits rakudobug
<masak> r​: role Foo { method bar { say self.WHICH } }; class Bar does
Foo { method bar { say self.WHICH; self.Foo​::bar } }; Bar.new.bar
<p6eval> rakudo c8de2e​: OUTPUT«Bar|549956910␤Foo␤»
<masak> I'd argue 'self' should still be the original invocant, even
in the role method.
<doy> agreed
<masak> r​: role Foo { method baz { say self.WHICH } }; class Bar does
Foo { method bar { say self.WHICH; self.baz } }; Bar.new.bar
<p6eval> rakudo c8de2e​: OUTPUT«Bar|1974449900␤Bar|1974449900␤»
<masak> ...and it's particular to the self.Role​::meth syntax. bingo.

From @jnthn

On Fri Dec 28 06​:00​:45 2012, masak wrote​:

<doy> r​: role Foo { method bar { "ROLE​:" ~ (self.defined ?? "D" !!
"U") } }; class Bar does Foo { method bar { "CLASS​:" ~ (self.defined
?? "D" !! "U") ~ "-" ~ self.Foo​::bar } }; say Bar.new.bar
<p6eval> rakudo c8de2e​: OUTPUT«CLASS​:D-ROLE​:U␤»
<doy> ^^ bug?
<doy> or is there another way i'm supposed to be doing that call
<masak> doy​: in-ter-es-ting.
<masak> doy++
* masak submits rakudobug

Fixed; it now gives​:

CLASS​:D-ROLE​:D

As expected. Tagging testneeded.

Thanks,

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @moritz

Tested in the ever-growing S14-roles/basic.t

@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'