From @masak

<masak> rakudo​: my @​a = 1,2,3; say @​a min 4
<p6eval> rakudo 531ca2​: OUTPUT«Multiple Dispatch​: No suitable
candidate found for 'cmp', with signature 'PP->I' [...]
<masak> question is, is this a new one, or the same as the undef one?
<masak> I should probably file it under the same ticket.
<pmichaud> it's not the same as the undef one
<pmichaud> I'm curious about the correct behavior there, though.
<masak> pmichaud​: I'd think that min numifies, so 3.
* masak submits rakudobug

From @masak

<pmichaud> anyway, S03 says that "By default C<min> and C<max> use
C<cmp> semantics." I don't think that implies numification of the arguments.
<masak> oh.
<masak> but what happens when you cmp a Num and a List?
<pmichaud> I don't know.
<pmichaud> Neither does Parrot, which is why we get "No suitable
candidate found ... " :-)
<masak> pasting this addendum to the ticket.

From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]

<pmichaud> anyway, S03 says that "By default C<min> and C<max> use
C<cmp> semantics." I don't think that implies numification of the arguments.
<masak> oh.
<masak> but what happens when you cmp a Num and a List?
<pmichaud> I don't know.
<pmichaud> Neither does Parrot, which is why we get "No suitable
candidate found ... " :-)
<masak> pasting this addendum to the ticket.

@masak - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @kyleha

This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in t/spec/S03-operators/misc.t

commit 824834991801e0e2dd07f36b661c24fac8a241ab
Author​: kyle <kyle@​c213334d-75ef-0310-aa23-eaa082d1ae64>
Date​: Mon Jul 27 15​:00​:43 2009 +0000

  [t/spec] Test for RT #​63778
 
  git-svn-id​: http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs@&#8203;27752 c213334d-75ef-0310-aa23-eaa082d1ae64

diff --git a/t/spec/S03-operators/misc.t b/t/spec/S03-operators/misc.t
index 9ff23d5..623dbdb 100644
--- a/t/spec/S03-operators/misc.t
+++ b/t/spec/S03-operators/misc.t
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use Test;
 Tests for Synopsis 3
 =end kwid
 
-plan 60;
+plan 62;
 
 my $str1 = "foo";
 my $str2 = "bar";
@@ -158,3 +158,12 @@ ok(?(42 > 12 & 20 & 32), "test the all infix operator");
     is((@a minmax @b), (1,8), 'minmax works when both are on left array');
     is((@b minmax @a), (1,8), 'minmax works when both are on right array');
 }
+
+# RT #63778
+{
+    my @a = 1, 2, 3;
+    #?rakudo todo 'RT #63778'
+    lives_ok { @a min 4 }, 'lives: @array min 4';
+    #?rakudo skip 'RT #63778'
+    is @a min 4, 1, 'works: @array min 4';
+}

From @moritz

I've opened a spec issues for this at
Raku/old-design-docs#28 and now close the rakudobug.

@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'