From @masak

<masak> nom​: role A[$B] { class C { method foo() { say $B } }; method
bar { C.foo } }; class D { }; A[D].bar
<p6eval> nom 3e66bd​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method('gist')␤
in sub say at src/gen/CORE.setting​:4957␤ in method foo at
/tmp/xCHvZokqR7​:1␤ in method bar [...]
* masak submits rakudobug
<moritz> I guess it doesn't like the inner class being composed at
compile time, before the role is being concretized

@coke - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Thu Oct 13 00​:30​:55 2011, masak wrote​:

<masak> nom​: role A[$B] { class C { method foo() { say $B } }; method
bar { C.foo } }; class D { }; A[D].bar
<p6eval> nom 3e66bd​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method('gist')␤
in sub say at src/gen/CORE.setting​:4957␤ in method foo at
/tmp/xCHvZokqR7​:1␤ in method bar [...]
* masak submits rakudobug
<moritz> I guess it doesn't like the inner class being composed at
compile time, before the role is being concretized

NPA gone​:

20​:04 <[Coke]> nom​: role A[$B] { class C { method foo() { say $B } }; method
  bar { C.foo } }; class D { }; A[D].bar
20​:04 <p6eval> rakudo b86628​: OUTPUT«Mu()␤»

Is this sufficient to close the ticket?

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @masak

coke (>)​:

Is this sufficient to close the ticket?

I would say so; the Null PMC access is gone. Resolving ticket.

@masak - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'