From @AlexDaniel

Code​:
with(1) { }

Result​:
===SORRY!=== Error while compiling ./test.pl
Unexpected block in infix position (missing statement control word before
the expression?)
at ./test.pl​:2
------> with(1)⏏ { }
  expecting any of​:
  infix
  infix stopper

It looks like “with” and “without” are missing some checks, unlike “if”,
“unless”. Here is what happens if you use if​:
===SORRY!===
Word 'if' interpreted as 'if()' function call; please use whitespace
instead of parens
at ./test.pl​:2
------> if⏏(1) { }
Unexpected block in infix position (two terms in a row)
at ./test.pl​:2
------> if(1)⏏ { }

In other words, “with” and “without” should produce same error message
about whitespace.

IRC log​: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2015-08-15#i_11061258

From @jnthn

On Fri Aug 14 19​:39​:48 2015, alex.jakimenko@​gmail.com wrote​:

Code​:
with(1) { }

Result​:
===SORRY!=== Error while compiling ./test.pl
Unexpected block in infix position (missing statement control word before
the expression?)
at ./test.pl​:2
------> with(1)⏏ { }
expecting any of​:
infix
infix stopper

It looks like “with” and “without” are missing some checks, unlike “if”,
“unless”. Here is what happens if you use if​:
===SORRY!===
Word 'if' interpreted as 'if()' function call; please use whitespace
instead of parens
at ./test.pl​:2
------> if⏏(1) { }
Unexpected block in infix position (two terms in a row)
at ./test.pl​:2
------> if(1)⏏ { }

In other words, “with” and “without” should produce same error message
about whitespace.

Fixed and tests added in S32-exceptions/misc.t.

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'