New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'Rakudo still uses Nil here' (Or bogus test?) #3883
Comments
From @cokePretty sure this predates the GLR - the current behavior is that the list has no holes, whereas we used to expect a Nil or a (). This ticket can probably be closed (and the tests removed) with review. -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @smlsYeah, the test seems bogus. I'll abuse the `testneeded` tag to make sure this ticket can be found by the Roast experts... :) |
From @zoffixznetSince the topic of this ticket is hidden in the changed title message, to clarify, it's about this test and whether it should be removed now: https://github.com/perl6/roast/blob/ab74762da156fa6fda5dd39281f7ffcc361d5a88/S04-statements/for.t#L473 |
From @TimToadyTest was bogus. Replaced with test that assumes Empty semantics on next. test fixed in 06f9c5d010986a7a8dde907971e25985e8ba4601 |
1 similar comment
From @TimToadyTest was bogus. Replaced with test that assumes Empty semantics on next. test fixed in 06f9c5d010986a7a8dde907971e25985e8ba4601 |
@TimToady - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#124568 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT124568$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: