From @masak

<masak> rn​: multi foo(​:$d!, *@​f) {}; multi foo(*@​f) { say "works" }; foo() #OK
<camelia> rakudo b2072f, niecza v24-75-g480a062​: OUTPUT«works␤»
<masak> rn​: multi foo(*@​f, :$d!) {}; multi foo(*@​f) { say "works" }; foo() #OK
<camelia> niecza v24-75-g480a062​: OUTPUT«works␤»
<camelia> ..rakudo b2072f​: OUTPUT«Ambiguous call to 'foo'; these
signatures all match​:␤​:(*@​f, :d(​:$d)!)␤​:(*@​f) [...]»
* masak submits rakudobug

Niecza has it right both times.

From @usev6

There already was a (skipped) test for this bug in S06-multi/positional-vs-named.t

I added a reference to this ticket with commit Raku/roast@d397bca9f2

@usev6 - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @jnthn

On Sun Sep 13 11​:39​:56 2015, bartolin@​gmx.de wrote​:

There already was a (skipped) test for this bug in S06-
multi/positional-vs-named.t

I added a reference to this ticket with commit
Raku/roast@d397bca9f2

Fixed the issue and unfudged the test.

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'