From @masak

<diakopter> phenny​: ask masak see VBBHREUVND in the backlog. bug? has
Int method
<masak> r​: class A { has Str method foo(--> Int) { return "hi" } }; say A.foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«Type check failed for return value;
expected 'Int' but got 'Str' [...]
<masak> r​: class A { has Int method foo() { return "hi" } }; say A.foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«hi␤»
<masak> diakopter​: yes, I think that's a bug.
<masak> let me check with spec.
<masak> looks like.
* masak submits rakudobug
<masak> r​: my Int sub foo { return "hi" }; say foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«Type check failed for return value;
expected 'Int' but got 'Str' [...]

From @jnthn

On Thu Nov 22 11​:33​:25 2012, masak wrote​:

<diakopter> phenny​: ask masak see VBBHREUVND in the backlog. bug? has
Int method
<masak> r​: class A { has Str method foo(--> Int) { return "hi" } };
say A.foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«Type check failed for return value;
expected 'Int' but got 'Str' [...]
<masak> r​: class A { has Int method foo() { return "hi" } }; say A.foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«hi␤»
<masak> diakopter​: yes, I think that's a bug.
<masak> let me check with spec.
<masak> looks like.
* masak submits rakudobug
<masak> r​: my Int sub foo { return "hi" }; say foo
<p6eval> rakudo bf472b​: OUTPUT«Type check failed for return value;
expected 'Int' but got 'Str' [...]

Already fixed; added test coverage in S06-advanced/return.t.

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'