From philip.g.potter@gmail.com

[17​:56​:50] <rhebus> rakudo​: my %v = Set.new(<a b c>)
[17​:56​:54] <p6eval> rakudo 859f2d​: OUTPUT«Odd number of elements found
where hash expected␤ in '!STORE' at line 5004​:CORE.setting␤ in main
program body at line 22​:/tmp/j0wKjmZefu␤»
[17​:57​:11] <rhebus> shouldn't I be able to put a Set in a %var?
[17​:57​:20] <rhebus> since Set does Associative?

From @Kodiologist

Actually, in 'my %v = Set.new(<a b c>)', %v is a Hash, and remains so
regardless of what you assign to it. I don't think the Synopses
explicitly specify what should be the result of assigning a Set to a
Hash, but I would expect to get '{a => True, b => True, c => True}', so
as to be consistent to KeyHashes. There is a test for this behavior in
S02-builtin_data_types/set.t, and as of Rakudo da7c7f9b3041, it passes.

If you want a %var to actually be a Set, say '%var := set <a b c>' or
'%var is Set' (although only the former works at the moment).

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@Kodiologist - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'