From @AlexDaniel

Similarly to https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=126990

Code​:
say Rat.Range

Result​:
-Inf..Inf

But you cannot store Infs in a Rat, therefore it should be -Inf^..^Inf (just like Int.Range).

From @lizmat

Fixed with 347271d214198a700, tests needed

On 28 Dec 2016, at 21​:29, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) <perl6-bugs-followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev
# Please include the string​: [perl #​130427]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL​: https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=130427 >

Similarly to https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=126990

Code​:
say Rat.Range

Result​:
-Inf..Inf

But you cannot store Infs in a Rat, therefore it should be -Inf^..^Inf (just like Int.Range).

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @zoffixznet

Tests added in Raku/roast@99f7d695a6

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

From @zoffixznet

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12​:29​:51 -0800, alex.jakimenko@​gmail.com wrote​:

Similarly to https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=126990

Code​:
say Rat.Range

Result​:
-Inf..Inf

But you cannot store Infs in a Rat, therefore it should be -Inf^..^Inf
(just like Int.Range).

Turns out Infs *are* in Rational range. So I undid the fix and added .Range to FatRats too

Rakudo commit​: rakudo/rakudo@b3ab375
Tests change​: Raku/roast@96cca2d5bb