From @LLFourn

< llfourn> m​: say defined all(Any,"foo") # Why is this true? Shouldn't it
autothread?
<+camelia> rakudo-moar 59bb1b​: OUTPUT«True␤»
< lizmat> llfourn​: that feels like a bug

Expected behaviour is that it should autothread and call .defined on the
values in the junction.

https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-11-14#i_13563873
^ Lizmat++ tried a quickfix but it didn't work so rakudobugging so it can
be addressed later.

From @zoffixznet

Thanks for the report.

Fixed in rakudo/rakudo@189cb23e84
Tests added in Raku/roast@6b84580ecc

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 04​:37​:49 -0800, lloyd.fourn@​gmail.com wrote​:

< llfourn> m​: say defined all(Any,"foo") # Why is this true? Shouldn't it
autothread?
<+camelia> rakudo-moar 59bb1b​: OUTPUT«True␤»
< lizmat> llfourn​: that feels like a bug

Expected behaviour is that it should autothread and call .defined on the
values in the junction.

https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-11-14#i_13563873
^ Lizmat++ tried a quickfix but it didn't work so rakudobugging so it can
be addressed later.

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

From @LLFourn

Thanks!

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1​:28 AM Zoffix Znet via RT <
perl6-bugs-followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

Thanks for the report.

Fixed in rakudo/rakudo@189cb23e84
Tests added in Raku/roast@6b84580ecc

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 04​:37​:49 -0800, lloyd.fourn@​gmail.com wrote​:

< llfourn> m​: say defined all(Any,"foo") # Why is this true? Shouldn't it
autothread?
<+camelia> rakudo-moar 59bb1b​: OUTPUT«True␤»
< lizmat> llfourn​: that feels like a bug

Expected behaviour is that it should autothread and call .defined on the
values in the junction.

https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-11-14#i_13563873
^ Lizmat++ tried a quickfix but it didn't work so rakudobugging so it can
be addressed later.