Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ObjAt doesn't .perl #5577

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

ObjAt doesn't .perl #5577

p6rt opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Aug 15, 2016

Migrated from rt.perl.org#128944 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT128944$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 15, 2016

From zefram@fysh.org

3.WHICH
Int|3
3.WHICH.perl
ObjAt.new
3.WHICH.perl.EVAL
Too few positionals passed; expected 2 arguments but got 1
  in block <unit> at EVAL_0 line 1
  in block <unit> at <unknown file> line 1

That's a rather poor .perl. It ought to emit something like
'ObjAt.new("Int|3")'.

ObjAt.new("Int|3")
Int|3
3.WHICH === ObjAt.new("Int|3")
True

-zefram

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 15, 2016

From @lizmat

Fixed with 8f43bb8 , tests still needed

On 15 Aug 2016, at 13​:28, Zefram (via RT) <perl6-bugs-followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string​: [perl #​128944]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL​: https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=128944 >

3.WHICH
Int|3
3.WHICH.perl
ObjAt.new
3.WHICH.perl.EVAL
Too few positionals passed; expected 2 arguments but got 1
in block <unit> at EVAL_0 line 1
in block <unit> at <unknown file> line 1

That's a rather poor .perl. It ought to emit something like
'ObjAt.new("Int|3")'.

ObjAt.new("Int|3")
Int|3
3.WHICH === ObjAt.new("Int|3")
True

-zefram

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 15, 2016

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Sep 9, 2016

From @zoffixznet

Tests added in Raku/roast@8c899ef549

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Sep 9, 2016
@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Sep 9, 2016

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant