Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

“.uninames” exists but “.uniprops” doesn't (‘١٩’.uniprops) #5270

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Apr 27, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

“.uninames” exists but “.uniprops” doesn't (‘١٩’.uniprops) #5270

p6rt opened this issue Apr 27, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
RFC Request For Comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Apr 27, 2016

Migrated from rt.perl.org#128009 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT128009$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Apr 27, 2016

From @AlexDaniel

Code​:
say �١٩�.uninames

Result​:
(ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE)

Code​:
say �١٩�.uniprops

Result​:
Method 'uniprops' not found for invocant of class 'Str'
  in block <unit> at -e line 1

I've seen mentions of that before, but this time I've stumbled upon it myself​: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-04-27#i_12400195

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Apr 27, 2016

From @timo

TBH, until now i thought "uniprops" would be a way to get at all properties of one codepoint.

though now that i see it so clearly next to "uniname"/"uninames", maybe that ought to get a different name ... uniprophash perhaps?

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Apr 27, 2016

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 11, 2016

From @samcv

This has now been implemented.
rakudo/rakudo@f55ff82

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 11, 2016

From @AlexDaniel

And tests were added in Raku/roast@297f17f

OK! Thank you very much!

On 2016-12-11 14​:14​:47, samantham@​posteo.net wrote​:

This has now been implemented.
rakudo/rakudo@f55ff82

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 11, 2016

@AlexDaniel - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Dec 11, 2016
@p6rt p6rt added the RFC Request For Comments label Jan 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFC Request For Comments
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant