Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.gist of a bag used to say “bag()”, now it says “Bag()” ("blogger".comb.Bag) #6600

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Oct 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
regression Issue did not exist previously

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Oct 13, 2017

Migrated from rt.perl.org#132281 (status was 'rejected')

Searchable as RT132281$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 13, 2017

From @AlexDaniel

Code​:
say "blogger".comb.Bag # if you want for all the letters

¦«2015.12»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2016.06»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2016.12»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2017.06»​:
bag(e, l, b, g(2), o, r)

¦«f72be0f130cf»​:
Bag(b, e, g(2), l, o, r)

Possible IRC discussion​: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-10-09#i_15278073

Bisectable​: (2017-07-20) rakudo/rakudo@21b9a72

To be honest, I don't know if that's a reasonable ticket. I guess it doesn't really matter if it's bag or Bag, but I'm pretty sure that the change was unintentional so I'm submitting it as a ticket.

Maybe �bag()� is better because it resembles an actual syntax. Kind of. Judge yourself.

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Apr 12, 2018

@AlexDaniel - Status changed from 'new' to 'rejected'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Apr 12, 2018
@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Apr 12, 2018

From @AlexDaniel

rakudo/rakudo#1722 (comment)

On 2017-10-12 22​:37​:24, alex.jakimenko@​gmail.com wrote​:

Code​:
say "blogger".comb.Bag # if you want for all the letters

¦«2015.12»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2016.06»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2016.12»​:
bag(r, l, g(2), b, e, o)

¦«2017.06»​:
bag(e, l, b, g(2), o, r)

¦«f72be0f130cf»​:
Bag(b, e, g(2), l, o, r)

Possible IRC discussion​: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-10-
09#i_15278073

Bisectable​: (2017-07-20)
rakudo/rakudo@21b9a72

To be honest, I don't know if that's a reasonable ticket. I guess it
doesn't really matter if it's bag or Bag, but I'm pretty sure that the
change was unintentional so I'm submitting it as a ticket.

Maybe “bag()” is better because it resembles an actual syntax. Kind
of. Judge yourself.

@p6rt p6rt added the regression Issue did not exist previously label Jan 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
regression Issue did not exist previously
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant