Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use lib 'lib' and perl6 -Ilib behave differently #5119

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Feb 7, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

use lib 'lib' and perl6 -Ilib behave differently #5119

p6rt opened this issue Feb 7, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Feb 7, 2016

Migrated from rt.perl.org#127483 (status was 'rejected')

Searchable as RT127483$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Feb 7, 2016

From @dnmfarrell

I'm having problems installing my module with panda (
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35246259/why-does-panda-fail-to-install-my-module-when-all-tests-pass-locally
)

But the issue appears to be perl6's different treatment of "use lib 'lib';"
versus the command line​: perl6 -Ilib ...

In the case of Pod-Perl5 the test suite passes when -Ilib is not included
as an argument to perl6.

Steps to reproduce for a single test​:

$ git clone https://github.com/dnmfarrell/Pod-Perl5
Cloning into 'Pod-Perl5'...
remote​: Counting objects​: 731, done.
remote​: Total 731 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 731
Receiving objects​: 100% (731/731), 129.62 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
Resolving deltas​: 100% (350/350), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
$ cd Pod-Perl5/
$ perl6 t/Perl5.t
1..5
ok 1 - Import Pod​::Perl5
ok 2 - parse string
ok 3 - parse document
ok 4 - parse document
ok 5 - parse document
$ perl6 -Ilib t/Perl5.t
1..5
ok 1 - Import Pod​::Perl5
ok 2 - parse string
ok 3 - parse document
ok 4 - parse document
not ok 5 - parse document

# Failed test 'parse document'
# at t/Perl5.t line 11
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 5

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 1, 2016

From @zoffixznet

Can't reproduce the issue.

Are you able to try again with the latest Rakudo, please?

--
Cheers,
ZZ | https://twitter.com/zoffix

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 1, 2016

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 29, 2019

From @usev6

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19​:14​:19 -0700, cpan@​zoffix.com wrote​:

Can't reproduce the issue.

Are you able to try again with the latest Rakudo, please?

Since there was no update on this ticket, I'm closing (rejecting) it now. I'm pretty sure we'd have more bug reports if this would be an issue with current rakudo versions.

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Aug 29, 2019
@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 29, 2019

@usev6 - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'

@p6rt p6rt added the Bug label Jan 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant