From @masak

<masak> m​: class A { my @​.foo handles <push> }; A.push("OH", "HAI"); say A.foo
<camelia> rakudo-moar a6f181​: OUTPUT«(timeout)»
<masak> locally​: "Cannot call 'trait_mod​:<handles>'; none of these
signatures match" (Attribute, Method)
<masak> am I greedy for wanting `my` + twigil + `handles` to work?
<masak> is that even theoretically possible?
<masak> it would be so awesome.
<jnthn> masak​: my @​.foo supporting handles is a cute idea at least.
It's not entirely straightforward.
<jnthn> masak​: But feasible with effort.
<jnthn> No objections to filing a TODO ticket for it.
<masak> developer torment? sounds like... a job for Perl 6! :P
<masak> what's the saying again​: "tormenting developers just for the sake of it"
* masak submits TODO ticket

From @AlexDaniel

Still reproducible (2017.11,HEAD(e5b660e)) (complains about trait_mod​:<handles>)

On 2014-10-16 13​:07​:07, masak wrote​:

<masak> m​: class A { my @​.foo handles <push> }; A.push("OH", "HAI");
say A.foo
<camelia> rakudo-moar a6f181​: OUTPUT«(timeout)»
<masak> locally​: "Cannot call 'trait_mod​:<handles>'; none of these
signatures match" (Attribute, Method)
<masak> am I greedy for wanting `my` + twigil + `handles` to work?
<masak> is that even theoretically possible?
<masak> it would be so awesome.
<jnthn> masak​: my @​.foo supporting handles is a cute idea at least.
It's not entirely straightforward.
<jnthn> masak​: But feasible with effort.
<jnthn> No objections to filing a TODO ticket for it.
<masak> developer torment? sounds like... a job for Perl 6! :P
<masak> what's the saying again​: "tormenting developers just for the
sake of it"
* masak submits TODO ticket

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'