New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No check whether operators are overloaded to lvalue functions. #1996
Comments
From abigail@arenanetworks.comCreated by abigail@arena-i.com#!/opt/perl/bin/perl no warnings; $o.foo = "bar"; This doesn't compile with the error: Can't modify concatenation (.) in scalar assignment at ./overloaded.pl However, the overloaded operator returns an lvalue, and hence the Abigail Perl Info
|
From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]Created by abigail@arena-i.com#!/opt/perl/bin/perl no warnings; $o.foo = "bar"; This doesn't compile with the error: Can't modify concatenation (.) in scalar assignment at ./overloaded.pl However, the overloaded operator returns an lvalue, and hence the Abigail Perl Info
|
From @cpansproutOn Fri May 19 04:35:48 2000, abigail@arenanetworks.com wrote:
This is partially fixed by commit bf8fb5e. If the $o.foo is changed to (I know, that barely fixes it at all, but it’s useful to have a trail |
From zefram@fysh.orgThe general case that this ticket is about cannot be reasonably made to This ticket should be closed. The meta ticket [perl #89650], which -zefram |
@cpansprout - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#3270 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT3270$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: