From timk@jtimothyking.com

<TimK1> rn​: sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<X>) { @​a <<+>>
$n }; say 1 .. 3 add 5;
<camelia> niecza v24-92-g3961d5d​: OUTPUT«6 7 8␤»
<camelia> ..rakudo 484f08​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m Error
while compiling /tmp/J6R82sHIP7␤Routine given to equiv does not appear
to be an operator␤at /tmp/J6R82sHIP7​:1␤------> ␤»
<TimK1> rn​: sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<+>) { @​a <<+>>
$n }; say (1 .. 3) add 5; # definitely not what I wanted
<camelia> rakudo 484f08, niecza v24-92-g3961d5d​: OUTPUT«6 7 8␤»

From @usev6

On Tue Sep 03 17​:37​:18 2013, timk wrote​:

<TimK1> rn​: sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<X>) { @​a <<+>>
$n }; say 1 .. 3 add 5;
<camelia> niecza v24-92-g3961d5d​: OUTPUT«6 7 8␤»
<camelia> ..rakudo 484f08​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m Error
while compiling /tmp/J6R82sHIP7␤Routine given to equiv does not appear
to be an operator␤at /tmp/J6R82sHIP7​:1␤------> ␤»
<TimK1> rn​: sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<+>) { @​a <<+>>
$n }; say (1 .. 3) add 5; # definitely not what I wanted
<camelia> rakudo 484f08, niecza v24-92-g3961d5d​: OUTPUT«6 7 8␤»

Hi,

currently both commands give the same result​:

$ perl6 -e 'sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<X>) { @​a <<+>> $n }; say 1 .. 3 add 5;'
6 7 8

$ perl6-m -e 'sub infix​:<add> (@​a, $n) is equiv(&infix​:<X>) { @​a <<+>> $n }; say (1 .. 3) add 5;'
6 7 8

What result did you expect? (esp. I don't understand your comment '# definitely not what I wanted' after the second command.)

Christian

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @smls

I agree with bartolin​: From what I can tell, it works as it should.

Closing the ticket.

@smls - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'