New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
POSIX.pm does not include strsignal(3) #10139
Comments
From rleigh@debian.orgCreated by rleigh@debian.orgThis is a bug report for perl from rleigh@debian.org, ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, Perl Info
|
From @ikegamiOn Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:41 AM, rleigh@debian.org <perlbug-followup@perl.org
In the meantime, perlipc shows how you can get the signal names (TERM, PIPE, |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @LeontOn Sun Feb 07 05:41:10 2010, rleigh@debian.org wrote:
I think the real debate is «should POSIX.pm support more of the POSIX All the more reasons to modularize POSIX in 5.17 IMHO. Leon |
From @jkeenanOn Sun Dec 11 16:07:55 2011, LeonT wrote:
Leon, Would you be able to draw a sketch of what that modularization might Thank you very much. |
From Mark@Overmeer.net* James E Keenan via RT (perlbug-followup@perl.org) [130205 03:01]:
I have tried to get modularization in core, but after much debate it I will add strsignal() to the next release. MarkOv Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#72602 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT72602$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: