New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Threaded builds failing on Fedora 28 #16552
Comments
From @jkeenanThreaded builds of Perl 5 blead are failing, apparently during miniperl, ##### ... which ultimately fails with: ##### ##### Here's some dialog from #p5p about this problem: ##### |
From @jkeenanSummary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 27 subversion 10) configuration: Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): |
From @jkeenanOn Mon, 07 May 2018 23:08:34 GMT, jkeenan@pobox.com wrote:
For discussion purposes, I have applied the Fedora patch indicated by xenu to the following smoke-test branch: smoke-me/jkeenan/133184-crypt-data -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @iabynOn Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:08:34PM -0700, James E Keenan (via RT) wrote:
It's probably overly defensive, but erring on the side of safety I propose we use the fedora glibc version-based patch for 5.28, -- |
From @doughera88On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 08:43:25AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
I didn't know the specific versions at play, but this patch is what I was
Yes, I agree. -- |
From @ppisarOn 2018-05-07, "James E Keenan (via RT)" <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
That's not casued by the Linux kernel.
But by Fedora 18's glibc that replaced upstream's libcrypt library with
I tried to send this patch to p5p at least four times via e-mail, but
glibc 2.2 and 2.3 contain the bug. 2.4 was released on 2006-03-06. -- Petr |
From @xsawyerxOn 05/08/2018 03:17 PM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Sounds good to me. |
From @xsawyerxHi Petr, Let's take this offline with Robert to see if we can figure out any If anyone experiences anything like this, please let me know. On 05/09/2018 03:45 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
|
From @xenuOn 9 May 2018 12:45:25 -0000
I see no connection between targeting C89 compilers and supporting |
From @iabynOn Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:21:38PM +0300, Sawyer X wrote:
Fedora fix now applied with v5.27.11-33-ge9c9cf5759. I'll remove this ticket from the 5.28 blockers now. (I've also changed the ticket's title again - its Fedora 28 rather than -- |
In May 2018 we applied e9c9cf5 patching Thank you very much. |
GH #16552 In 2003 a fix was added to workaround a bug in glibc's crypt_r() implementation (which involved tweaking a private undocumented field within the crypt_data struct). This bug has long since been fixed, but the workaround remained. This commit finally removes that workaround. See also v5.27.11-33-ge9c9cf5759.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:23:35PM -0800, James E Keenan wrote:
In May 2018 we applied e9c9cf5 patching `pp.c` in response to build-time failures on Fedora 28. Is there anything we still need to do in this ticket?
What remained to to I have just done with v5.31.8-91-g7b1d420218, so the
ticket can be closed now.
…--
Monto Blanco... scorchio!
|
Migrated from rt.perl.org#133184 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT133184$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: