New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Useless Useless Use Warning when invoking colonpaired routines #6244
Comments
From @zoffixznetThe `constant value [ ]` is not uselessly used here, as the warning claims: Can be worked around with: |
From @briandfoy#`( Useless use of constant value [ ] in sink context (lines 9, 9) I don't think it was useless because it did what I needed. I really wanted the ᔑ to be tighter then ., but that's not a real sub prefix:<ᔑ> (Pair $p --> Pair) is tighter(&postcircumfix:<[ ]>) { |
From @zoffixznetBisected to rakudo/rakudo@127338a |
From @zoffixznetOn Tue, 23 May 2017 15:06:45 -0700, comdog wrote:
Based on symptoms and bisection results, this is the same issue as RT#131305 Merging this ticket there... |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @zoffixznetOn Tue, 23 May 2017 15:06:45 -0700, comdog wrote:
Thank you for the report. This is now fixed. Fix: rakudo/rakudo@c6b7012a9c61133 |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'new' to 'resolved' |
From @usev6On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:32:30 -0800, cpan@zoffix.com wrote:
For the records: The Rakudo fix made some previously passing tests die on the JVM backend. One example is: $ ./perl6-j -e 'say infix:["+"](2,3)' I'm not going to reopen this ticket, but I'll add the ticket number to the fudge message (so that the connection to Rakudo commit c6b7012a9c61133 is clear). |
From @zoffixznetOn Sat, 13 Jan 2018 23:51:44 -0800, bartolin@gmx.de wrote:
Could someone double-check the fix makes sense? I'm going to re-open the ticket. I don't trust the fix. |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open' |
From @zoffixznetOn Sun, 14 Jan 2018 02:14:57 -0800, cpan@zoffix.com wrote:
I reverted the original fix and marked the rogue block as wanted instead in rakudo/rakudo@64803b0af8 bartolin, would you check whether that fixes JVM and close this ticket if it does? |
From @usev6On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:30:47 -0800, cpan@zoffix.com wrote:
Yes, the tests are passing again on the JVM backend. Thanks! I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'. |
@usev6 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#131305 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT131305$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: