From @AlexDaniel

Code​:
IO​::Handle.new(​:path(â��-â��)).path.say

Result​:
"".IO

OK, let's try "".IO

Code​:
"".IO

Result​:
Must specify something as a path​: did you mean '.' for the current directory?
  in block <unit> at -e line 1

It does not work. But this does​:

Code​:
"-".IO.say

Result​:
"".IO

From @coke

On Sat May 07 17​:30​:05 2016, alex.jakimenko@​gmail.com wrote​:

Code​:
IO​::Handle.new(​:path(â��-â��)).path.say

Result​:
"".IO

OK, let's try "".IO

Code​:
"".IO

Result​:
Must specify something as a path​: did you mean '.' for the current
directory?
in block <unit> at -e line 1

It does not work. But this does​:

Code​:
"-".IO.say

Result​:
"".IO

The bug report seems to expect that you can use a gist output, EVAL it, and get the original back. That is what .perl is for, not .gist; Given that, do you still wish to keep this issue open? (and if so, can you clarify the justification)

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @AlexDaniel

Given that, do you still wish to keep this issue open? (and if so, can
you clarify the justification)

Yes. I'd say that "-".IO (which is also a valid code) is more user readable than "".IO (which is not a real thing).

That being said, I think that it is also OK to print something like STDIN. But why bother if "-".IO will do just fine.

From @MasterDuke17

Fixed in rakudo/rakudo@376950acf2
Tests added in Raku/roast@2759cf2fce

@MasterDuke17 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'