Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spurious warning when trying to smartmatch num64 against Num in Rakudo #4876

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Spurious warning when trying to smartmatch num64 against Num in Rakudo #4876

p6rt opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Dec 15, 2015

Migrated from rt.perl.org#126927 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT126927$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 15, 2015

From @masak

<RabidGravy> m​: say num64 ~~ Num
<camelia> rakudo-moar 9e53fa​: OUTPUT«Cannot unbox a type object [...]
<RabidGravy> eh?
[...]
<TimToady> m​: say num64 ~~ Num;
<camelia> rakudo-moar b7c6b5​: OUTPUT«Cannot unbox a type object [...]
<TimToady> huh
<TimToady> did that one get reported?
<masak> don't think so
* masak submits rakudobug

Expected behavior​: no error about unboxing, and the output "True".

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 15, 2015

From @stmuk

Bisected to f457007181bb6e2dcb6aefe857f36d648ae38401

1 similar comment
@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 15, 2015

From @stmuk

Bisected to f457007181bb6e2dcb6aefe857f36d648ae38401

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jul 21, 2017

From @dogbert17

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12​:36​:13 -0800, steve.mynott+bitcard@​gmail.com wrote​:

Bisected to f457007181bb6e2dcb6aefe857f36d648ae38401

This was fixed with rakudo/rakudo@cff3437.
Tests needed

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jul 21, 2017

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 13, 2017

From @zoffixznet

Tests​: Raku/roast@c8ebdbbf89

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 13, 2017

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant