New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perlre: (?n) should be documented #14930
Comments
From victor@drawall.ccCreated by @Grimyperl5.22 introduced the /n regex modifier. /(?n)/ works as expected, but isn’t Perl Info
|
From @jkeenanOn Fri Sep 25 05:41:08 2015, victor@drawall.cc wrote:
So far, so good.
I'm confused. I don't see the '/n' regex modifier being used in the second sentence. And I'm not clear as to how you expect /(?n)/ to work? Can you clarify? Thank you very much. -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @rjbs* James E Keenan via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2015-09-25T20:11:17]
/was (not was)/n is equivalent to /(?n)was (not was)/ but "n" is not in the documentation of: "(?adlupimsx-imsx)" or in: "(?adluimsx-imsx:pattern)" I believe this is the complaint. -- |
From @khwilliamsonI have applied commit |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'open' to 'pending release' |
From @khwilliamsonThank you for submitting this report. You have helped make Perl better. Perl 5.24.0 may be downloaded via https://metacpan.org/release/RJBS/perl-5.24.0 |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'pending release' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#126177 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT126177$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: