From @FROGGS

m​: my $a = (1, 2, 3); $a[42] = 21
camelia rakudo-moar 00be1e​: OUTPUT«Index out of range. Is​: 42, should be
in 0..2␤ in block <unit> at /tmp/nnTEvtevbH​:1␤␤»
GLRelia rakudo-moar 467b79​: OUTPUT«Attempted to STORE to Nil.␤ in block
<unit> at /tmp/o9_DeZFRmB​:1␤␤»

Both answers are far from ideal because you cannot assign to a List
anyway, even when you use an existing position.

From @AlexDaniel

Today (2017.11,HEAD(e5b660e)) it prints this message​:

Cannot modify an immutable Str (Nil)
  in block <unit> at -e line 1

Which is still LTA

On 2015-09-02 05​:09​:29, FROGGS.de wrote​:

m​: my $a = (1, 2, 3); $a[42] = 21
camelia rakudo-moar 00be1e​: OUTPUT«Index out of range. Is​: 42, should be
in 0..2␤ in block <unit> at /tmp/nnTEvtevbH​:1␤␤»
GLRelia rakudo-moar 467b79​: OUTPUT«Attempted to STORE to Nil.␤ in block
<unit> at /tmp/o9_DeZFRmB​:1␤␤»

Both answers are far from ideal because you cannot assign to a List
anyway, even when you use an existing position.

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @lizmat

Fixed with c9699ab , tests needed. Please note that this currently breaks tests 55-56 in S02-types/range.t which appear to be a little too specific for their own good.

On 3 Dec 2017, at 05​:28, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT <perl6-bugs-followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

Today (2017.11,HEAD(e5b660e)) it prints this message​:

Cannot modify an immutable Str (Nil)
in block <unit> at -e line 1

Which is still LTA

On 2015-09-02 05​:09​:29, FROGGS.de wrote​:

m​: my $a = (1, 2, 3); $a[42] = 21
camelia rakudo-moar 00be1e​: OUTPUT«Index out of range. Is​: 42, should be
in 0..2␤ in block <unit> at /tmp/nnTEvtevbH​:1␤␤»
GLRelia rakudo-moar 467b79​: OUTPUT«Attempted to STORE to Nil.␤ in block
<unit> at /tmp/o9_DeZFRmB​:1␤␤»

Both answers are far from ideal because you cannot assign to a List
anyway, even when you use an existing position.

From @zoffixznet

Tests​: rakudo/rakudo@fed56be258b5f326831875a4

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'