New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Numbers: 2**10000000000 and 1/(2**10000) #4495
Comments
From chrjae@gmail.com2**10000000000 and 1/(2**10000) both silently return 0. $ perl6 --version Christian. |
@coke - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @cokeOn Sat Aug 29 01:59:19 2015, chrjae@gmail.com wrote:
I get slightly different behavior: $ perl6 -e 'say 2**10000000000' -- |
From 1parrota@gmail.com"I get slightly different behavior:" - that's not surprising, given 7 The division's 0 is probably justified, depending on your definition How far beyond the values of the physical universe does a practical On 3/18/16, Will Coleda via RT <perl6-bugs-followup@perl.org> wrote:
|
From chrjae@gmail.com2016-03-18 18:40 GMT+00:00 Parrot Raiser via RT <
There's what I expect: $ perl -we 'print 2**10000000000,"\n"' |
From @zoffixznetThis now throws. Tests needed. $ perl6 -e 'print 2**10000000000,"\n"' Actually thrown at: |
From @zoffixznetTests added in Raku/roast@c7a560688a |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
From @zoffixznetFudging tests and reopening as the issue appears to still exist on OSX: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2016-09-11#i_13187953 |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open' |
From @zoffixznetOn Sun, 11 Sep 2016 06:04:20 -0700, cpan@zoffix.com wrote:
Closing per confirmation this is now fixed: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2016-12-08#i_13704594 |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#125938 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT125938$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: