New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SvREFCNT_dec_NN in Devel::PPPort in 5.20 is bad #13801
Comments
From @wolfsageHowdy folks, bulk88 pointed out that I added some code to Devel::PPPort in 3.22 for Since we're in a freeze and so close to release, I'm wondering which 1. I can downgrade Devel::PPPort in blead back to the earlier safe 2. I can attempt to fix Devel::PPPort and release a new version and include it 3. I can remove the bad function from Devel::PPPort until I have I'm kind of leaning towards 1 here. This should be a blead blocker. Thoughts? Thanks, -- Matthew Horsfall (alh) |
From @khwilliamsonOn 05/06/2014 09:59 AM, Matthew Horsfall (via RT) wrote:
I think 1 is the least risky alternative |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @rjbs* Matthew Horsfall <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2014-05-06T11:59:12]
Sounds best.
It is so marked. -- |
From @rjbsthe module deltas are generated automatically just in time; no need to revert things -- |
@rjbs - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#121805 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT121805$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: