New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistency in perlpod.pod in version 5.18.2 and earlier #13730
Comments
From ronw.mrmx@gmail.comI notice an inconsistency in perlpod.pod that is also present in the In the section describing =encoding, there is the sentence: And don't forget, when using any other command, that the command There is no heading separating this from the description of =encoding I ran a simple test program to confirm the behaviour of Perl. Lines Perhaps a heading before that sentence could be added. Perl Info
|
From @khwilliamsonHow about the attached patch? |
From @khwilliamson0020-PATCH-perl-121630-perlpod-clarification.patchFrom 0cd922e8ae56bdf29e8cf21481b4185589dc7beb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl Williamson <khw@cpan.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:10:37 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 20/20] PATCH: [perl #121630]: perlpod clarification
---
pod/perlpod.pod | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pod/perlpod.pod b/pod/perlpod.pod
index 7333fcc..0a55ffd 100644
--- a/pod/perlpod.pod
+++ b/pod/perlpod.pod
@@ -296,14 +296,16 @@ module. Examples:
=encoding big5
-=back
-
C<=encoding> affects the whole document, and must occur only once.
-And don't forget, when using any other command, that the command lasts up
+=back
+
+And don't forget, all commands but C<=encoding> last up
until the end of its I<paragraph>, not its line. So in the
examples below, you can see that every command needs the blank
-line after it, to end its paragraph.
+line after it, to end its paragraph. (And some older
+Pod translators may require the C<=encoding> line to be similarly
+separated.)
Some examples of lists include:
--
1.8.3.2
|
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From ronw.mrmx@gmail.comLooks good. Thanks for replying. On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Karl Williamson via RT <
|
From @jkeenanOn Thu Apr 10 09:46:52 2014, ronw.mrmx@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible for you to post that simple test program as an attachment?
Thank you very much. |
From @jkeenanOn Sat May 17 09:40:39 2014, jkeenan wrote:
Ignore the above. I didn't see that khw had supplied a patch. Thank you very much. |
From @khwilliamsonOn Sat May 17 09:42:28 2014, jkeenan wrote:
But I didn't either see ron's favorable response, or just plumb forgot to apply that patch. So thanks for the reminder. Now applied as commit |
From @jkeenanOn Sat May 17 11:35:00 2014, khw wrote:
Karl, is this ticket now closable? Thank you very much. |
From @khwilliamsonThanks for the reminder; now closing |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#121630 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT121630$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: