New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
study /foo/ should warn #12494
Comments
From @cpansproutcommit c277df4 Jumbo regexp patch applied (with minor fix-up tweaks): This hunk makes no sense: @@ -2389,7 +2389,11 @@ yylex(void) Studying the boolean returned by /.../ is not helpful, as no match is likely to be performed on that boolean. And if it were, study() would not help, as it has only ever helped for very long strings. Flags: Site configuration information for perl 5.17.5: Configured by sprout at Sat Sep 22 18:51:23 PDT 2012. Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 17 subversion 5) configuration: Locally applied patches: @INC for perl 5.17.5: Environment for perl 5.17.5: |
From @demerphqOn 14 October 2012 23:52, Father Chrysostomos <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
I thought we made study a noop some time back? If we bring it back Yves -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @cpansproutOn Mon Oct 15 02:54:07 2012, demerphq wrote:
Studying &PL_sv_yes and &PL_sv_no? (Sorry for the cryptic response, but I don’t know how to explain it -- Father Chrysostomos |
From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]On Mon Oct 15 02:54:07 2012, demerphq wrote:
Studying &PL_sv_yes and &PL_sv_no? (Sorry for the cryptic response, but I don’t know how to explain it -- Father Chrysostomos |
From @demerphqOn 15 October 2012 16:47, Father Chrysostomos via RT
I don't find it cryptic so no worries. And yes while it is silly to Im inclined to say that we should just remove *any* study based code cheers, -- |
From @cpansproutOn Mon Oct 15 07:51:23 2012, demerphq wrote:
Aha, now I see what I forgot to say. chr /foo/ warns about ambiguity. So does every other operator with a ;$
I have already removed it. :-) Don’t remove study itself, though. I use it all the time so I can set a -- Father Chrysostomos |
From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]On Mon Oct 15 07:51:23 2012, demerphq wrote:
Aha, now I see what I forgot to say. chr /foo/ warns about ambiguity. So does every other operator with a ;$
I have already removed it. :-) Don’t remove study itself, though. I use it all the time so I can set a -- Father Chrysostomos |
From @demerphqOn 16 October 2012 02:40, Father Chrysostomos via RT
You seem to have a stronger opinion about warning than I do about not,
Heh, cool idea. Yves -- |
From @iabynOn Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:40:12PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
Personally I always use pp_sin - it's less to type :-) -- |
From @bulk88On Tue Oct 16 02:15:51 2012, davem wrote:
I use a |system('pause');| to create C breakpoint, it is a call to the |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#115264 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT115264$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: