From @masak

<moritz> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
<p6eval> rakudo d9fd17​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter
'$nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS at
src/gen/CORE.setting [...]
<colomon> that's a legit rakudo bug
<moritz> aye
* moritz leaves it to masak++
* masak submits it

From @coke

On Sun May 06 09​:53​:31 2012, masak wrote​:

<moritz> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
<p6eval> rakudo d9fd17​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter
'$nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS at
src/gen/CORE.setting [...]
<colomon> that's a legit rakudo bug
<moritz> aye
* moritz leaves it to masak++
* masak submits it

This no longer errors, but seems to be doing... a lot of somethings.

... Now what?

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Sat Nov 17 15​:36​:41 2012, coke wrote​:

On Sun May 06 09​:53​:31 2012, masak wrote​:

<moritz> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
<p6eval> rakudo d9fd17​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter
'$nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS at
src/gen/CORE.setting [...]
<colomon> that's a legit rakudo bug
<moritz> aye
* moritz leaves it to masak++
* masak submits it

This no longer errors, but seems to be doing... a lot of somethings.

... Now what?

Erroring again​:

22​:36 < [Coke]> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
22​:36 <+camelia> rakudo 8a0859​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter
  'nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS
  at src/gen/CORE.setting​:7990␤ in sub infix​:<**> at
  src/gen/CORE.setting​:8131␤ in sub infix​:<**> at
  src/gen/CORE.setting​:3020␤ in block at /tmp/GbNF6TmPgz​:1␤␤»…

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @coke

On Wed May 29 19​:36​:59 2013, coke wrote​:

On Sat Nov 17 15​:36​:41 2012, coke wrote​:

On Sun May 06 09​:53​:31 2012, masak wrote​:

<moritz> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
<p6eval> rakudo d9fd17​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for
parameter
'$nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub DIVIDE_NUMBERS at
src/gen/CORE.setting [...]
<colomon> that's a legit rakudo bug
<moritz> aye
* moritz leaves it to masak++
* masak submits it

This no longer errors, but seems to be doing... a lot of somethings.

... Now what?

Erroring again​:

22​:36 < [Coke]> r​: say 1.0000001 ** (10 ** 9)
22​:36 <+camelia> rakudo 8a0859​: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for
parameter
'nu'; expected Int but got Num instead␤ in sub
DIVIDE_NUMBERS
at src/gen/CORE.setting​:7990␤ in sub infix​:<**> at
src/gen/CORE.setting​:8131␤ in sub infix​:<**> at
src/gen/CORE.setting​:3020␤ in block at
/tmp/GbNF6TmPgz​:1␤␤»…

This is back to hanging again, which I think is the "correct" behavior - how to test this? put it in a timer so that if doesn't error in 5s, we kill it and call it good?

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @zoffixznet

Tests added in Raku/roast@7143a330e9

@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'