Skip Menu |
 
Report information
Id: 66092
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: perl5

Owner: Nobody
Requestors: hmbrand <h.m.brand [at] xs4all.nl>
Cc: dagolden [at] cpan.org
AdminCc:

Operating System: (no value)
PatchStatus: (no value)
Severity: High
Type: meta
Perl Version: 5.10.0
Fixed In: (no value)



Subject: Meta-ticket for perl5.10.1
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:16:42 +0200
To: perlbug [...] perl.org
From: "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.brand [...] xs4all.nl>
This is a place-holder/parent for bugs that stall the release of perl-5.10.1
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 141b
Since 5.10.1 has been released, I guess marking this is stalled makes sense (it shouldn't be resolved, since there are unresolved dependents)
RT-Send-CC: perl5-porters [...] perl.org
I think unlinking the dependents and closing it is fine. -doy
CC: perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject: Re: [perl #66092] Meta-ticket for perl5.10.1
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 10:54:16 +0100
To: Jesse Luehrs via RT <perlbug-comment [...] perl.org>
From: Nicholas Clark <nick [...] ccl4.org>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 329b
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:24:31PM -0700, Jesse Luehrs via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> I think unlinking the dependents and closing it is fine.
But are all the dependents actually resolved? (In that, if we thought that something was worth fixing for 5.10.1, but ultimately didn't, don't we still think that it's worth fixing?) Nicholas Clark
CC: Jesse Luehrs via RT <perlbug-comment [...] perl.org>, perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject: Re: [perl #66092] Meta-ticket for perl5.10.1
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:19:06 -0500
To: Nicholas Clark <nick [...] ccl4.org>
From: Jesse Luehrs <doy [...] tozt.net>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 548b
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:24:31PM -0700, Jesse Luehrs via RT wrote:
> > I think unlinking the dependents and closing it is fine.
> > But are all the dependents actually resolved? > > (In that, if we thought that something was worth fixing for 5.10.1, but > ultimately didn't, don't we still think that it's worth fixing?)
Well, yeah, that's why they are still open. If we still think we want them to be fixed specifically by 5.18, we can add them to the 5.18 meta ticket. -doy
CC: perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject: Re: [perl #66092] Meta-ticket for perl5.10.1
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:50:41 +0100
To: Jesse Luehrs <doy [...] tozt.net>
From: Nicholas Clark <nick [...] ccl4.org>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 1.1k
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:19:06AM -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote: Show quoted text
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:24:31PM -0700, Jesse Luehrs via RT wrote:
> > > I think unlinking the dependents and closing it is fine.
> > > > But are all the dependents actually resolved? > > > > (In that, if we thought that something was worth fixing for 5.10.1, but > > ultimately didn't, don't we still think that it's worth fixing?)
> > Well, yeah, that's why they are still open. If we still think we want > them to be fixed specifically by 5.18, we can add them to the 5.18 meta > ticket.
That seems like an excellent plan. Does that ticket exist yet? (I couldn't find it, but I can find the equivalents for 5.14.0 and 5.16.0) This is also "interesting" in that it still has open children: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=70369 [META] Needs expert assessment for 5.12.0 but possibly after 2 years it deserves the same fate as https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=70421 [META] Non-critical bugs for Perl 5.12.0 in that those bugs aren't really special, if no-one has fixed them and no-one else has reported them. Nicholas Clark


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

For issues related to this RT instance (aka "perlbug"), please contact perlbug-admin at perl.org