From @lizmat

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_-- for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; .value-- for $b.pairs; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_ = 0 for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>0,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

Same for MixHash. Baggy/Mixy need to have the equivalent logic to ISINSET from SetHash.

RTing this so it won’t fall through the cracks.

From @AlexDaniel

This was resolved together with https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=131241

Tests needed, maybe. See other ticket for info on this.
On 2016-12-17 01​:42​:04, elizabeth wrote​:

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_-- for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; .value-- for $b.pairs; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_ = 0 for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>0,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

Same for MixHash. Baggy/Mixy need to have the equivalent logic to
ISINSET from SetHash.

RTing this so it won’t fall through the cracks.

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @dogbert17

On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14​:53​:26 -0700, alex.jakimenko@​gmail.com wrote​:

This was resolved together with
https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=131241

Tests needed, maybe. See other ticket for info on this.
On 2016-12-17 01​:42​:04, elizabeth wrote​:

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_-- for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; .value-- for $b.pairs; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>1,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

$ 6 'my $b = <a b b c d e f>.BagHash; $_ = 0 for $b.values; dd $b'
BagHash $b = ("a"=>0,"c"=>0,"b"=>0,"e"=>0,"f"=>0,"d"=>0).BagHash
*SHOULD* be BagHash $b = ("b"=>1).BagHash

Same for MixHash. Baggy/Mixy need to have the equivalent logic to
ISINSET from SetHash.

RTing this so it won’t fall through the cracks.

Tests added in Raku/roast@75ee890. Closing issue.

@dogbert17 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'