New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CPAN user bootstrap of cpanminus fails on CENTOS #14704
Comments
From ajs@ajs.comCreated by ajs@ajs.comThis is a bug report for perl from ajs@ajs.com, ----------------------------------------------------------------- curl -s -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - App::cpanminus -l ~/.perl5 per the cpanmius documentation, and it failed with this error on a base --> Working on ExtUtils::Manifest As a workaround, installing the system package for CPAN via "yum install Perl Info
|
From @tonycozOn Thu May 14 10:50:18 2015, ajs wrote:
perl 5.10 is no longer supported. Your perl doesn't seem to have any version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker installed, If cpanminus claims to support 5.10 you might want to follow it up with them. Tony |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From p5p@net153.netOn 05/14/2015 08:26 PM, Tony Cook via RT wrote:
Yes, the redhat fellas split perl in parts for some reason for --Sam |
From @ppisarOn 2015-05-15, Tony Cook via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
The log reads: ExtUtils-Manifest declares dependency on Resolution: (1) This is a bug in ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.04 distribution. (2) This effectively creates a build cycle preventing from
If you need ExtUtils::Manifest module, you can install it with "yum
Tell your superuser you need all Perl core modules. This can be achieved
The reason for splitting the packages is that not everybody wants all -- Petr |
From @LeontOn Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@redhat.com> wrote:
ExtUtils::MakeMaker bundles its dependencies specifically for this kind of
This is legitimate, but the "perl" package being the minimalistic one Leon |
From @karenetheridgeOn Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote:
And isn't this a violation of the perl licencing agreement? |
From @shlomifOn Fri, 15 May 2015 13:10:31 -0700
Why? Where do you see a limitation that prevents doing that (assuming the source * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software Note: I am not a lawyer (IANAL). Regards, Shlomi Fish -- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ <rindolf> preaction: every mighty Klingon warrior uses Vim. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . |
@iabyn - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
From @bulk88Shlomi Fish wrote:
They still have to rename their language to "Hural" since to call it |
From @rjbs* bulk88 <bulk88@hotmail.com> [2015-05-16T05:01:27]
I'm not sure whether bulk88 is joking. We're not going to do that. Roughly once every two years we say that we want to standardize what may or may -- |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#125195 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT125195$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: