Skip Menu |
Report information
Id: 125053
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: perl6

Owner: Nobody
Requestors: davidnmfarrell [at] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Severity: (no value)
Tag: (no value)
Platform: (no value)
Patch Status: (no value)
VM: (no value)



See https://github.com/perl6/roast/blob/03686da5d7f8d8c359e0ce6a538e29dc95e1d218/S04-declarations/multiple.t#L29-L31

Do we *really* want to allow multi subs without multi (when there's a proto)? If so, why? Because you can replace “sub” with a “multi” and it easy to do yet it adds clarity.

Is this ticket rejectable?


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

For issues related to this RT instance (aka "perlbug"), please contact perlbug-admin at perl.org