Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roast rakudo skip/todo test:./S04-declarations/multiple.t line:30 reason: 'nom regression' #4186

Closed
p6rt opened this issue May 3, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented May 3, 2015

Migrated from rt.perl.org#125053 (status was 'open')

Searchable as RT125053$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 2, 2017

From @AlexDaniel

See https://github.com/perl6/roast/blob/03686da5d7f8d8c359e0ce6a538e29dc95e1d218/S04-declarations/multiple.t#L29-L31

Do we *really* want to allow multi subs without multi (when there's a proto)? If so, why? Because you can replace “sub” with a “multi” and it easy to do yet it adds clarity.

Is this ticket rejectable?

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 2, 2017

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@lizmat
Copy link
Contributor

lizmat commented Jan 11, 2020

I've seen another ticket today in which it was decided that this was NOT going to be supported. So closing this ticket now.

@lizmat lizmat closed this as completed Jan 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants