Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using a Pager for POD6 #247

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Oct 18, 2011 · 7 comments
Closed

Using a Pager for POD6 #247

p6rt opened this issue Oct 18, 2011 · 7 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Oct 18, 2011

Migrated from rt.perl.org#101558 (status was 'open')

Searchable as RT101558$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 18, 2011

From kpolulak@gmail.com

I just used `perl6 --doc` for the first time and the very first thing that
went through my head was "Aw man, no pager?"

I would like to suggest using a pager (e.g. 'less') by default. I think this
would follow the principle of least surprise a little better as most Perl
users are very accustomed to using a pager with perldoc. Not only that but
it's kind of annoying to have to scroll up all the time.

I suggested the idea to tadzik and he seemed to like it and wanted more
feedback.

--
- Kevin Polulak (soh_cah_toa)

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 26, 2011

From @moritz

I'm all for it, if we make sure that it doesn't become fragile. That
includes

- falling back to the current behavior if no pager is available
- catching errors while launching the pager, and falling back to the
current behavior
- tested on Linux, Mac OS X and Win32

If we can get it to run reliably, I'm all for it.

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Oct 26, 2011

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 7, 2012

From @moritz

I'm a bit confused about what to do with an RFC bug. Close it, because
no patch was forthcoming? Regard it as a feature request?

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 28, 2017

From @AlexDaniel

Yea, it is a feature request. And I'd say a very reasonable one.

On 2012-08-07 14​:43​:12, moritz wrote​:

I'm a bit confused about what to do with an RFC bug. Close it, because
no patch was forthcoming? Regard it as a feature request?

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented May 7, 2020

So I guess it should go to the problem-solving repo.

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented May 7, 2020

Closing this after opening the issue above.

@JJ JJ closed this as completed May 7, 2020
@lizmat lizmat transferred this issue from Raku/old-issue-tracker Dec 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants