New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perlbug should identify trackable module better #15981
Comments
From @iabynCreated by @iabynThis is an issue forked from RT #131258, where I pointed out: On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar via
Perlbug is supposed to do this. However, the code currently only does: if the module is not bundled with perl: However, Module::CoreList's pod entry for it's bug_tracker() method So perlbug won't correctly handle modules bundled with perl that have a I think the actual logic should be: if the module is not bundled with perl: Perl Info
|
From @jkeenanOn Mon, 15 May 2017 07:36:17 GMT, davem wrote:
How is the data in %Module::CoreList::upstream and %Module::CoreList::bug_tracker updated? I ask because, in the course of looking at this RT, I noticed that the data for File::Path is out-of-date. ##### I could push a change for this one line, but that would beg the question of how many other inaccurate entries there currently are? Thank you very much. -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#131316 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT131316$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: