New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LTA error message when doing 'is' on a package declaration in Rakudo #2939
Comments
From @masak<masak> r: package X is Associative { } |
From 1parrota@gmail.comIf the same sort of problem, (in this case "LTA Error Message"), keeps (As an ignorant kibitzer, I may well have missed the point.) |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @geekosaurOn Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Parrot Raiser <1parrota@gmail.com> wrote:
"LTA" is not a mechanism. It means "less than awesome"; the point is that -- |
From 1parrota@gmail.com
Understood, (though I thought the "A" was for "Adequate"). I meant the process of identifying errors and generating messages. |
From @geekosaurOn Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Parrot Raiser <1parrota@gmail.com> wrote:
That tends to come from people actually trying to use perl6 for something -- |
From @moritzOn 10/19/2012 09:59 PM, Parrot Raiser wrote:
So how could a rethinking of the error detection mechanism look like? Cheers, |
From @skidsBehavor change: $ perl -e 'package X is Associative { }; X.WHAT.say; say X ~~ Associative' |
From @skidsOn Mon Sep 14 20:17:00 2015, bri@abrij.org wrote:
Oh, and that's just because X is ... well, X: $ perl6 -e 'package Y is Associative { }' |
From @AlexDanielStill reproducible (2017.11, HEAD(5929887)). The issue with X was a regression that was resolved in RT#125689, so right now even the original snippet shows the problem. On 2015-09-14 20:18:54, bri@abrij.org wrote:
|
Migrated from rt.perl.org#115364 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT115364$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: