From @masak

<jnthn> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(sub foo { say $i }) };
.() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«1␤2␤3␤4␤5␤»
<jnthn> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(method foo { say $i })
}; .() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Useless declaration of has-scoped
Method in a module; add our or my to install it in the lexpad or
namespace␤Subfoo (subid "82_1307132053.89459") has no $!llsig and no
$!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤ in main program body
at line 1␤»
<jnthn> wow :)
<TimToady> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(anon method foo {
say $i }) }; .() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Subfoo (subid "82_1307132137.63473")
has no $!llsig and no $!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤
in main program body at line 1␤»
<TimToady> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(anon method foo {
say $i }) }; .($_) for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Subfoo (subid "82_1307132201.72778")
has no $!llsig and no $!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤
in main program body at line 1␤»
<jnthn> Not going to bother investigating; just been re-working that
chunk in nom and thought "huh, something looks adrift here..." :)
<masak> jnthn​: hm, is it OK with you if I submit that one to RT?
<jnthn> masak​: Why not? :)
* masak submits rakudobug
<jnthn> masak​: It'll make sure it gets a test that way :)
<jnthn> And...one step closer to 2000 :P
<masak> ;)

From @jnthn

On Fri Jun 03 13​:32​:21 2011, masak wrote​:

<jnthn> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(sub foo { say $i }) };
.() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«1␤2␤3␤4␤5␤»
<jnthn> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(method foo { say $i })
}; .() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Useless declaration of has-scoped
Method in a module; add our or my to install it in the lexpad or
namespace␤Subfoo (subid "82_1307132053.89459") has no $!llsig and no
$!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤ in main program body
at line 1␤»
<jnthn> wow :)
<TimToady> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(anon method foo {
say $i }) }; .() for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Subfoo (subid "82_1307132137.63473")
has no $!llsig and no $!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤
in main program body at line 1␤»
<TimToady> rakudo​: my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(anon method foo {
say $i }) }; .($_) for @​a
<p6eval> rakudo 048573​: OUTPUT«Subfoo (subid "82_1307132201.72778")
has no $!llsig and no $!lazysig␤ in <anon> at line 7674​:CORE.setting␤
in main program body at line 1␤»
<jnthn> Not going to bother investigating; just been re-working that
chunk in nom and thought "huh, something looks adrift here..." :)
<masak> jnthn​: hm, is it OK with you if I submit that one to RT?
<jnthn> masak​: Why not? :)
* masak submits rakudobug
<jnthn> masak​: It'll make sure it gets a test that way :)
<jnthn> And...one step closer to 2000 :P
<masak> ;)

Now​:

my @​a; for 1..5 -> $i { @​a.push(anon method foo { say $i }) }; .($_)
for @​a
1
2
3
4
5

Just needs tests.

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @jnthn

Test added by tadzik++.

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'