Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\bugrep0-34706349 #73

Closed
p5pRT opened this issue Jun 17, 1999 · 3 comments
Closed

C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\bugrep0-34706349 #73

p5pRT opened this issue Jun 17, 1999 · 3 comments

Comments

@p5pRT
Copy link

p5pRT commented Jun 17, 1999

Migrated from rt.perl.org#875 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT875$

@p5pRT
Copy link
Author

p5pRT commented Jun 17, 1999

From MCVAYRA@mail.northgrum.com

The rand() function should produce a specific, repeatable sequence
of number given some specific seed value passed to srand(). I have
found that all the Unix ports of Perl, versions 5.004 and 5.005, do
behave in this manner but the Intel ports do not. Using the simple
program

  srand('028350);
  print rand(), "\n";

from the command line the following results were obtained.

======== Win95
perl -e "srand('028350');print rand();"
0.826446533203125
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for MSWin32-x86-object

perl -e "srand('028350');print rand();"
0.6142578125
This is perl, version 5.004_02

======== Linux (Intel)
perl -e 'srand("028350");print rand(),"\n";'
0.0450114482082427
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i686-linux

======== AIX
perl -e 'srand("028350");print rand(),"\n";'
0.053741455078125
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.004_01

perl -e 'srand("028350"); print rand(),"\n";'
0.053741455078125
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.005_02 built for aix

======== DEC Unix
perl -e 'srand("028350");print rand(),"\n";'
0.053741455078125
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.004_01

======== HPUX
perl -e 'srand("028350");print rand(),"\n";'
0.053741455078125
perl -v
This is perl, version 5.004_01

Perl Info


Site configuration information for perl 5.00503:

Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 5 subversion 03) configuration:
  Platform:
    osname=MSWin32, osvers=4.0, archname=MSWin32-x86-object
    uname=''
    hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=undef
    usethreads=undef useperlio=undef d_sfio=undef
  Compiler:
    cc='cl.exe', optimize='-Od -MD -DNDEBUG -TP -GX', gccversion=
    cppflags='-DWIN32'
    ccflags ='-Od -MD -DNDEBUG -TP -GX -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT
-DHAVE_DES_FCRYPT -DPERL_OBJECT'
    stdchar='char', d_stdstdio=define, usevfork=false
    intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8
    d_longlong=undef, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=10
    alignbytes=8, usemymalloc=n, prototype=define
  Linker and Libraries:
    ld='link', ldflags ='-nologo -nodefaultlib -release -machine:x86'
    libpth="D:\usr\lib\core"
    libs= oldnames.lib kernel32.lib user32.lib gdi32.lib  winspool.lib
comdlg32.lib advapi32.lib shell32.lib ole32.lib  oleaut32.lib netapi32.lib
uuid.lib wsock32.lib mpr.lib winmm.lib  version.lib odbc32.lib odbccp32.lib
PerlCRT.lib
    libc=D:\usr\lib\core\PerlCRT.lib, so=dll, useshrplib=yes,
libperl=perlcore.lib
  Dynamic Linking:
    dlsrc=dl_win32.xs, dlext=dll, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags=' '
    cccdlflags=' ', lddlflags='-dll -nologo -nodefaultlib -release
-machine:x86'

Locally applied patches:
    ACTIVEPERL_LOCAL_PATCHES_ENTRY


@INC for perl 5.00503:
    D:/usr/lib
    D:/usr/site/lib
    .


Environment for perl 5.00503:
    HOME=D:\WinCVS
    LANG (unset)
    LANGUAGE (unset)
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH (unset)
    LOGDIR (unset)
 
PATH=E:\VISUALCAFE\JAVA\BIN;D:\WINCVS;D:\USR\BIN;C:\NOVELL\CLIENT32;C:\WINDO
WS;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND;D:\BIN;C:\PROGRA~1\COMMON~1\POWERS~1;D:\TCL\BIN;D:\ORA
WIN\BIN;D:\ORAWIN95\BIN;D:\QUANTUM;C:\LANCD;E:\IMNNQ_95
    PERL_BADLANG (unset)
    SHELL (unset)

@p5pRT p5pRT closed this as completed Nov 28, 2003
@p5pRT
Copy link
Author

p5pRT commented Nov 28, 2003

From The RT System itself

comparing unix ports and intel ports is weird. Probably means win32 and unix.

@p5pRT
Copy link
Author

p5pRT commented Nov 28, 2003

From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]

different platforms may use different rand() functions.

As long as the sequence generated by​:

srand( 10 );
for (1..3) { print rand(); }

is consistent between multiple runs on one platform, this isn't a bug.

Obviously - the above snippet should be extendable to any srand value or any length sequence.

The idea _is_ to generate a random number, not something that can be specified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant