From @masak

<masak> rakudo​: say (uniq 1, "1").perl
<p6eval> rakudo 924242​: OUTPUT«(1)␤»
<masak> is that what we expect of uniq?
<TimToady> no, I expect === semantics
* masak submits rakudobug
<TimToady> Cat.new("mitsy") and Dog.new("mitsy") are obviously two
different critters [01​:11]
<masak> yap.

From @jnthn

On Sat Feb 05 16​:17​:52 2011, masak wrote​:

<masak> rakudo​: say (uniq 1, "1").perl
<p6eval> rakudo 924242​: OUTPUT«(1)␤»
<masak> is that what we expect of uniq?
<TimToady> no, I expect === semantics
* masak submits rakudobug
<TimToady> Cat.new("mitsy") and Dog.new("mitsy") are obviously two
different critters [01​:11]
<masak> yap.

Fixed now​:

say (uniq 1, "1").perl
(1, "1").list

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Mon Dec 10 10​:39​:12 2012, jnthn@​jnthn.net wrote​:

On Sat Feb 05 16​:17​:52 2011, masak wrote​:

<masak> rakudo​: say (uniq 1, "1").perl
<p6eval> rakudo 924242​: OUTPUT«(1)␤»
<masak> is that what we expect of uniq?
<TimToady> no, I expect === semantics
* masak submits rakudobug
<TimToady> Cat.new("mitsy") and Dog.new("mitsy") are obviously two
different critters [01​:11]
<masak> yap.

Fixed now​:

say (uniq 1, "1").perl
(1, "1").list

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

Added test to S32-list/uniq.t , which had another related test for RT#​111360.

Resolving ticket.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda

@coke - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'