Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rakudo doesn't understand [+] alone in a statement #2288

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Dec 7, 2010 · 3 comments
Closed

Rakudo doesn't understand [+] alone in a statement #2288

p6rt opened this issue Dec 7, 2010 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Dec 7, 2010

Migrated from rt.perl.org#80332 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT80332$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 7, 2010

From @masak

<masak> std​: [+]
<p6eval> std a194beb​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY! [...] FAILED 00​:01 118m␤»
<masak> TimToady​: if C<[+]> is a listop, why is C<[+]> not a valid
program, but needs to be C<[+] ()>?
<TimToady> that's a known bug, but only happens at the end of the buffer
<masak> std​: [+]; say "OH HAI"
<TimToady> iirc
<p6eval> std a194beb​: OUTPUT«ok 00​:01 120m␤»
<masak> oh, ok.
<jnthn> rakudo​: [+]
<p6eval> rakudo : OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Confused at line 22, near "[+]"␤»
<jnthn> rakudo​: [+];
<p6eval> rakudo : OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Confused at line 22, near "[+];"␤»
<jnthn> aww.
<jnthn> rakudo​: [+]; say "I am ok!"
<p6eval> rakudo : OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Confused at line 22, near "[+]; say \""␤»
* masak submits rakudobug
* jnthn wonders if that and the other parsing bug are related.

"The other parsing bug" is http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=80330

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 31, 2012

From @moritz

works now, tested in S03-metaops/reduce.t

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 31, 2012

@moritz - Status changed from 'new' to 'resolved'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Mar 31, 2012
@p6rt p6rt added the Bug label Jan 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant