From @masak

<masak> rakudo​: class A { has $.x is rw; method foo { say $!x } };
class B is A { has $.x; method bar { say $!x } }; given B.new(​:x(42))
{ .A​::x = 5; .foo; .bar }
<p6eval> rakudo 479650​: OUTPUT«5␤5␤»
<masak> this, I posit, is RONG.
<masak> I don't know if that's in RT yet.
<sjohnson> heh
<masak> huh; actually I expected that to be 42\n42\n.
<masak> well, not "expected" as in "what correct Perl 6 should
produce" expected :)
<masak> but "expected" as in "how I thought rakudo would misbehave" expected
<masak> guess I can produce an entirely *different* bug out of it, then.
<masak> rakudo​: class A { has $.x is rw }; class B is A { has $.x };
given B.new(​:x(42)) { .A​::x = 5; say .x }
<p6eval> rakudo 479650​: OUTPUT«5␤»
* masak submits rakudobug

From @jnthn

On Thu Oct 28 14​:46​:12 2010, masak wrote​:

<masak> rakudo​: class A { has $.x is rw; method foo { say $!x } };
class B is A { has $.x; method bar { say $!x } }; given B.new(​:x(42))
{ .A​::x = 5; .foo; .bar }
<p6eval> rakudo 479650​: OUTPUT«5␤5␤»
<masak> this, I posit, is RONG.
<masak> I don't know if that's in RT yet.

Works fine these days​:

class A { has $.x is rw; method foo { say $!x } }; class B is A { has
$.x; method bar { say $!x } }; given B.new(​:x(42)) { .A​::x = 5; .foo; .bar }
5
42

<masak> huh; actually I expected that to be 42\n42\n.
<masak> well, not "expected" as in "what correct Perl 6 should
produce" expected :)
<masak> but "expected" as in "how I thought rakudo would misbehave"
expected
<masak> guess I can produce an entirely *different* bug out of it, then.
<masak> rakudo​: class A { has $.x is rw }; class B is A { has $.x };
given B.new(​:x(42)) { .A​::x = 5; say .x }
<p6eval> rakudo 479650​: OUTPUT«5␤»

This one also works fine​:

class A { has $.x is rw }; class B is A { has $.x }; given
B.new(​:x(42)) { .A​::x = 5; say .x }
42

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @moritz

Tested in S12-methods/accessors.t.

@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'