Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rakudo parses $?:: but STD doesn't #2074

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Aug 16, 2010 · 5 comments
Closed

rakudo parses $?:: but STD doesn't #2074

p6rt opened this issue Aug 16, 2010 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Aug 16, 2010

Migrated from rt.perl.org#77248 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT77248$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 16, 2010

From @bbkr

[18​:32] <bbkr> rakudo​: $?​:: # known?
[18​:32] <p6eval> rakudo 2f18a4​: ( no output )
[18​:33] <TimToady> std​: $?​::
[18​:33] <p6eval> std 31912​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0mâ�¤Bogus
statement at /tmp/wRPEja655t line 1​:â�¤------> �[32m<BOL>�[33mâ���[31m$?​::�
[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 114mâ�¤Â»
[18​:34] <moritz_> no idea.

so reporting just in case

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Sep 20, 2011

From @coke

On Mon Aug 16 09​:38​:12 2010, pawel.pabian@​implix.com wrote​:

[18​:32] <bbkr> rakudo​: $?​:: # known?
[18​:32] <p6eval> rakudo 2f18a4​: ( no output )
[18​:33] <TimToady> std​: $?​::
[18​:33] <p6eval> std 31912​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0mâ�¤Bogus
statement at /tmp/wRPEja655t line 1​:â�¤------> �[32m<BOL>�[33mâ���[31m$?​::�
[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 114mâ�¤Â»
[18​:34] <moritz_> no idea.

so reporting just in case

This now fails in rakudo​:

08​:24 < [Coke]> rakudo​: $?​:: # known?
08​:24 <+p6eval> rakudo cbdd9b​: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===â�¤Non-declarative
sigil is
  missing its name at line 1, near "$?​:: # kno"â�¤Â»

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Sep 20, 2011

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented May 29, 2012

From @moritz

Closing (but without tests, since I don't know how exactly it should die).

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented May 29, 2012

@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed May 29, 2012
@p6rt p6rt added the weird label Jan 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant