From @bbkr

[12​:43] <bbkr> std​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> std 31588​: OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0mâ�¤Expecting a
term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix ~� (to suppress this
message, please use space between ~ ~) at /tmp/EZ59HXaH3Q line 1​:â�¤------> �
[32m555 ~~!~~�[33mâ���[31m 666�[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 112mâ�¤Â»
[12​:43] <bbkr> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> rakudo 1086ff​: ( no output )

[12​:44] <jnthn> heh
[12​:44] <jnthn> bet it parsed as
[12​:44] <jnthn> 555 ~~ !(((666)))

From @coke

On Fri Jul 09 03​:45​:52 2010, pawel.pabian@​implix.com wrote​:

[12​:43] <bbkr> std​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> std 31588​:
OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m�Expecting a
term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix ~� (to suppress
this
message, please use space between ~ ~) at /tmp/EZ59HXaH3Q line
1​:â�¤------> �
[32m555 ~~!~~�[33mâ���[31m 666�[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 112mâ�¤Â»
[12​:43] <bbkr> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> rakudo 1086ff​: ( no output )

[12​:44] <jnthn> heh
[12​:44] <jnthn> bet it parsed as
[12​:44] <jnthn> 555 ~~ !(((666)))

This is actually failing differently via evalbot & the REPL​:

555 ! 666
Confused at line 1, near " 555 !"

but​:

00​:50 <[Coke]> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
00​:50 <p6eval> rakudo 67778a​: ( no output )

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Tue Aug 17 21​:51​:39 2010, coke wrote​:

On Fri Jul 09 03​:45​:52 2010, pawel.pabian@​implix.com wrote​:

[12​:43] <bbkr> std​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> std 31588​:
OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m�Expecting a
term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix ~� (to suppress
this
message, please use space between ~ ~) at /tmp/EZ59HXaH3Q line
1​:â�¤------> �
[32m555 ~~!~~�[33mâ���[31m 666�[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 112mâ�¤Â»
[12​:43] <bbkr> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> rakudo 1086ff​: ( no output )

[12​:44] <jnthn> heh
[12​:44] <jnthn> bet it parsed as
[12​:44] <jnthn> 555 ~~ !(((666)))

This is actually failing differently via evalbot & the REPL​:

555 ! 666
Confused at line 1, near " 555 !"

but​:

00​:50 <[Coke]> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
00​:50 <p6eval> rakudo 67778a​: ( no output )

REPL confusion no longer happens, just reports "False".

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @Mouq

Current behavior​:

02​:31 <Mouq> m​: 555 ! 666
02​:31 <camelia> rakudo-moar 070196​: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/C8fk2pizJCâ�¤Expecting a term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix
  ~â�¤ (to suppress this message, please use space between ~ ~)â�¤at /tmp/C8fk2pizJC​:1â�¤------> 555 ~~!~~â�� 666â�¤Â»

In the REPL​:

555 ! 666
False

Closable with tests :)

On Sat Oct 20 18​:18​:29 2012, coke wrote​:

On Tue Aug 17 21​:51​:39 2010, coke wrote​:

On Fri Jul 09 03​:45​:52 2010, pawel.pabian@​implix.com wrote​:

[12​:43] <bbkr> std​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> std 31588​:
OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m�Expecting a
term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix ~� (to suppress
this
message, please use space between ~ ~) at /tmp/EZ59HXaH3Q line
1​:â�¤------> �
[32m555 ~~!~~�[33mâ���[31m 666�[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 112mâ�¤Â»
[12​:43] <bbkr> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> rakudo 1086ff​: ( no output )

[12​:44] <jnthn> heh
[12​:44] <jnthn> bet it parsed as
[12​:44] <jnthn> 555 ~~ !(((666)))

This is actually failing differently via evalbot & the REPL​:

555 ! 666
Confused at line 1, near " 555 !"

but​:

00​:50 <[Coke]> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
00​:50 <p6eval> rakudo 67778a​: ( no output )

REPL confusion no longer happens, just reports "False".

From @Mouq

Tests added to Roast in commit​:

commit afcf79755ff704d4c07c5384011b6fe94492e752
Author​: Mouq <alexmoquin@​gmail.com>
Date​: Wed Mar 4 00​:28​:08 2015 -0500

  Add tests for RTs #​73198 and #​76436

Closing as resolved :)

On Tue Mar 03 18​:32​:34 2015, Mouq wrote​:

Current behavior​:

02​:31 <Mouq> m​: 555 ! 666
02​:31 <camelia> rakudo-moar 070196​: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while
compiling /tmp/C8fk2pizJC�Expecting a term, but found either infix ~~
or redundant prefix
~� (to suppress this message, please use space
between ~ ~)â�¤at /tmp/C8fk2pizJC​:1â�¤------> 555 ~~!~~â�� 666â�¤Â»

In the REPL​:

555 ! 666
False

Closable with tests :)

On Sat Oct 20 18​:18​:29 2012, coke wrote​:

On Tue Aug 17 21​:51​:39 2010, coke wrote​:

On Fri Jul 09 03​:45​:52 2010, pawel.pabian@​implix.com wrote​:

[12​:43] <bbkr> std​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> std 31588​:
OUTPUT«�[31m===�[0mSORRY!�[31m===�[0m�Expecting a
term, but found either infix ~~ or redundant prefix ~� (to
suppress
this
message, please use space between ~ ~) at /tmp/EZ59HXaH3Q line
1​:â�¤------> �
[32m555 ~~!~~�[33mâ���[31m 666�[0mâ�¤Parse failedâ�¤FAILED 00​:01 112mâ�¤Â»
[12​:43] <bbkr> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
[12​:43] <p6eval> rakudo 1086ff​: ( no output )

[12​:44] <jnthn> heh
[12​:44] <jnthn> bet it parsed as
[12​:44] <jnthn> 555 ~~ !(((666)))

This is actually failing differently via evalbot & the REPL​:

555 ! 666
Confused at line 1, near " 555 !"

but​:

00​:50 <[Coke]> rakudo​: 555 ! 666
00​:50 <p6eval> rakudo 67778a​: ( no output )

REPL confusion no longer happens, just reports "False".

@Mouq - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'