New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nested triangular reduce produces empty list #1877
Comments
From @moritz09:33 < tylercurtis> rakudo: say [\+] [\+] 1 xx 5 doesn't work :( 09:33 < tylercurtis> pugs: say [\+] [\+] 1 xx 5 Yep, pugs gets it right 09:35 <@moritz_> rakudo: say ([\+] 1 xx 5).perl first one still works... 09:35 <@moritz_> rakudo: say ([\+] ([\+] 1 xx 5)).perl Nesting doesn't. Doesn't seem to be a precedence problem. 09:36 < tylercurtis> rakudo: say ([\+] [[\+] 1 xx 5]) Aha. over-eager argument flattening somewhere? -- |
From @masak<masak> rakudo: say [+] [1,2,3] # bug courtesy of TimToady++ |
From [Unknown Contact. See original ticket]<masak> rakudo: say [+] [1,2,3] # bug courtesy of TimToady++ |
@masak - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @cokeOn Sat Jun 26 00:44:28 2010, mlenz@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
And rakudo does too, now:
These all work now. Just need tests. -- |
From @cokeOn Tue Jul 06 04:44:22 2010, masak wrote:
Answer's changed. (Is it right? Dunno).
-- |
From @cokeOn Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Will Coleda via RT
09:36 < pmichaud> [Coke]: Rakudo is correct
So, just needs tests. -- |
From @moritzTested in S03-metaops/reduce.t. moritz |
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#76110 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT76110$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: