New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strange error when doing '.= new' on an attribute in Rakudo #1741
Comments
From @masak<masak> rakudo: class A {}; class B { has A $.foo .= new } |
@coke - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From sohtil@gmail.comSee also #77200 for a similar[1] error caused by using .= new with a [1]...regarding the message. Don't know about the internals. |
From @cokeOn Sun May 02 08:33:11 2010, masak wrote:
This now complains about trying to append to an unitialized string, 15:51 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A {}; class B { has A $.foo .= new } Closable with tests. -- |
From @cokeOn Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Will Coleda via RT
Whoa. much less reasonable is that IMCC error hidden in the output -- |
From @diakopterOn Fri Oct 21 12:55:20 2011, coke wrote:
it is now much more reasonable. marking testneeded. 13:53 <diakopter> rakudo: class A {}; class B { has A $.foo .= new } |
From @bbkrTest in |
@bbkr - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
From @bbkrReopening because this is limitation of Rakudo, not Spec: moritz bbkr: is that behavior specced? 22:19 |
@bbkr - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open' |
From @bbkrfudged test in |
From @MouqFixed in Rakudo commit: commit df5b31eae0cdecd36d7aa92ea07fdec4843de051 Implement #74850 "has Array $.x .= new(1, 2, 3);" And the test bbkr++ mentioned was unfudged. Closing as resolved :) On Mon Jul 16 13:33:54 2012, bbkr wrote:
|
@Mouq - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#74850 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT74850$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: