From @masak

<diakopter> rakudo​: class Boo { method new() { } }; say Boo.new
<p6eval> rakudo 70667a​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in type() [...]
<masak> rakudo​: class Boo {}; say Boo.new
<p6eval> rakudo 70667a​: ( no output )
* masak submits rakuodbug
<masak> rakudo​: class Boo { method foo() { } }; say Boo.foo
<p6eval> rakudo 70667a​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in type() [...]

From @masak

<diakopter> rakudo​: class Boo { method new() { 1; } }; say Boo.new.WHAT
<p6eval> rakudo 70667a​: OUTPUT«Int()␤»
<masak> oh.
<masak> rakudo​: sub foo() {}; say foo
<p6eval> rakudo 70667a​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in type() [...]
<masak> the Null PMC access isn't from having a method, it's from the
return value.
<diakopter> seems so
* masak modifies the rakudobug

@masak - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @bbkr

[18​:50] <bbkr> rakudo​: class Boo { method new() { } }; say Boo.new.WHAT;
# why Parcel? (testing http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=72836)
[18​:50] <p6eval> rakudo 9808d7​: OUTPUT«Parcel()␤»
[18​:50] <masak> bbkr​: because Nil is a Parcel.
[18​:52] <bbkr> rakudo​: class Boo { method foo() { } }; say Boo.foo.WHAT
[18​:52] <p6eval> rakudo ac8a2a​: OUTPUT«Parcel()␤»

taken for tests

From @bbkr

tests in
t/spec/S06-advanced_subroutine_features/return.t

@bbkr - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'