New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Defining two different enumerations with the same enum value should result in ambiguity in Rakudo; doesn't #1492
Comments
From @masak<masak> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say &a.perl According to S12:1787, rather than just picking B::a, &a should be |
From nastavs@gmail.comHere's something more along the same lines. <isBEKaml> rakudo: enum One <a b c d e>; enum Two <a b c d e>; say &d; for sure, it's a LTA error message. Regards, Shrivatsan |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From nastavs@gmail.comOn Thu May 27 01:19:33 2010, svatsan wrote:
<isBEKaml> rakudo: enum One <a b c d e>; say One::d.WHAT.perl; enum Two |
From @cokeCurrent status: mostly the same, looks like the leading & is no longer 15:19 < [Coke]> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say &a.perl -- |
1 similar comment
From @cokeCurrent status: mostly the same, looks like the leading & is no longer 15:19 < [Coke]> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say &a.perl -- |
From @bbkr2012.10 - still broken (should fail on redeclaration) <bbkr_> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say c.perl STD error: <bbkr_> std: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say c.perl |
From @masakOn Thu Nov 15 05:16:59 2012, bbkr wrote:
Just for the record; no, it shouldn't fail on redeclaration (despite |
From @FROGGSPatch: rakudo/rakudo@e340863189 |
@FROGGS - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#72696 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT72696$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: