New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make &infix:($op) work #1183
Comments
From @japhbAllow the name of an operator to be specified dynamically without using -'f |
From @moritzThe &infix:{$foo} form is now gone from the spec, but &infix:($foo) |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @cokeOn Tue Mar 30 08:24:48 2010, moritz wrote:
23:54 < [Coke]> rakudo: my $foo="+";&infix:($foo)(3,4).say -- |
From @cokeOn Mon Sep 19 20:55:21 2011, coke wrote:
Behavior changed:
-- |
From @peschwaOn Fri Mar 29 21:03:53 2013, coke wrote:
Specs commit fc1083f0b2b225728b34f5a5ed19a0ac29aa0c49 removed the infix:() form, which I take to mean this ticket can be closed or renamed to something along the lines of "LTA message for wrongly using a signature literal to refer to a foofix longname". |
From @FROGGSThe design docs indicate that square brackets need to be used, which works with rakudo: constant $foo="+"; say &infix:[$foo](3, 4) So, this is closable with test? |
From @MasterDuke17Tests added in Raku/roast@d63dad7427 |
@MasterDuke17 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#68024 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT68024$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: