From johan.viklund@gmail.com

-- code --
class A {
  method a(*@​A) {
  say "A self={self.perl} arg={@​A.perl}"
  }
}

class B is A {
  method a(*@​A) {
  nextwith("FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG")}
}

B.new.a()

-- output --

A self="FIRST ARG" arg=["SECOND ARG"]

-- what I expected --

A self=B.new() arg=["FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG"]

-- comment --

If you are supposed to supply self as the first argument to nextwith
for this to work, I think I should get a "Method not found" error in
this case.

--
Johan Viklund

From @jnthn

On Thu Jun 25 15​:43​:59 2009, viklund wrote​:

-- code --
class A {
method a(*@​A) {
say "A self={self.perl} arg={@​A.perl}"
}
}

class B is A {
method a(*@​A) {
nextwith("FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG")}
}

B.new.a()

-- output --

A self="FIRST ARG" arg=["SECOND ARG"]

-- what I expected --

A self=B.new() arg=["FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG"]

-- comment --

If you are supposed to supply self as the first argument to nextwith
for this to work, I think I should get a "Method not found" error in
this case.

Yes, it was supposed to give the output you expected, but failed to due
to a bug. Fixed in git 48c1791 and added an example like this as a
regression test too (plus similar one for callwith).

Thanks,

Jonathan

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

From @moritz

jnthn@​jnthn.net via RT wrote​:

On Thu Jun 25 15​:43​:59 2009, viklund wrote​:

-- code --
class A {
method a(*@​A) {
say "A self={self.perl} arg={@​A.perl}"
}
}

class B is A {
method a(*@​A) {
nextwith("FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG")}
}

B.new.a()

-- output --

A self="FIRST ARG" arg=["SECOND ARG"]

-- what I expected --

A self=B.new() arg=["FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG"]

-- comment --

If you are supposed to supply self as the first argument to nextwith
for this to work, I think I should get a "Method not found" error in
this case.

Yes, it was supposed to give the output you expected, but failed to due
to a bug. Fixed in git 48c1791 and added an example like this as a
regression test too (plus similar one for callwith).

Did you actually commit it? I noticed no such commit...

Cheers,
Moritz

From @moritz

ok, jnthn++ now committed the tests too.

From @kyleha

This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in at least one of these files​: b/t/spec/S12-methods/defer-call.t, b/t/spec/S12-methods/defer-next.t